arrow_back_ios

Main Menu

See All Acoustic End-of-Line Test Systems See All DAQ and instruments See All Electroacoustics See All Software See All Transducers See All Vibration Testing Equipment See All Academy See All Resource Center See All Applications See All Industries See All Insights See All Services See All Support See All Our Business See All Our History See All Our Sustainability Commitment See All Global Presence
arrow_back_ios

Main Menu

See All Actuators See All Combustion Engines See All Durability See All eDrive See All Transmission & Gearboxes See All Turbo Charger See All DAQ Systems See All High Precision and Calibration Systems See All Industrial electronics See All Power Analyser See All S&V Hand-held devices See All S&V Signal conditioner See All Accessories See All DAQ Software See All Drivers & API See All nCode - Durability and Fatigue Analysis See All ReliaSoft - Reliability Analysis and Management See All Test Data Management See All Utility See All Vibration Control See All Acoustic See All Current / voltage See All Displacement See All Load Cells See All Pressure See All Strain Gauges See All Torque See All Vibration See All LDS Shaker Systems See All Power Amplifiers See All Vibration Controllers See All Accessories for Vibration Testing Equipment See All Training Courses See All Whitepapers See All Acoustics See All Asset & Process Monitoring See All Custom Sensors See All Data Acquisition & Analysis See All Durability & Fatigue See All Electric Power Testing See All NVH See All Reliability See All Smart Sensors See All Vibration See All Weighing See All Automotive & Ground Transportation See All Calibration See All Installation, Maintenance & Repair See All Support Brüel & Kjær See All Release Notes See All Compliance See All Our People
arrow_back_ios

Main Menu

See All CANHEAD See All GenHS See All LAN-XI See All MGCplus See All Optical Interrogators See All QuantumX See All SomatXR See All Fusion-LN See All Accessories See All Hand-held Software See All Accessories See All BK Connect / Pulse See All API See All Microphone Sets See All Microphone Cartridges See All Acoustic Calibrators See All Special Microphones See All Microphone Pre-amplifiers See All Sound Sources See All Accessories for acoustic transducers See All Experimental testing See All Transducer Manufacturing (OEM) See All Accessories See All Non-rotating (calibration) See All Rotating See All CCLD (IEPE) accelerometers See All Charge Accelerometers See All Impulse hammers / impedance heads See All Cables See All Accessories See All Electroacoustics See All Noise Source Identification See All Environmental Noise See All Sound Power and Sound Pressure See All Noise Certification See All Industrial Process Control See All Structural Health Monitoring See All Electrical Devices Testing See All Electrical Systems Testing See All Grid Testing See All High-Voltage Testing See All Vibration Testing with Electrodynamic Shakers See All Structural Dynamics See All Machine Analysis and Diagnostics See All Process Weighing See All Calibration Services for Transducers See All Calibration Services for Handheld Instruments See All Calibration Services for Instruments & DAQ See All On-Site Calibration See All Resources See All Software License Management
illustration of a car, train, wind power, and oil platform for HBK Technology Days 2022

2022 HBK Technology Days

This 6-part series of 90-minute virtual seminars focus on the performance, durability or reliability requirements of a specific industry or application.

The six sessions showcased applications of measurement, monitoring and modelling for electrical, acoustical and structural performance from batteries to bridges to aircraft landing gear and electric vehicles.

The presented applications will help you to overcome challenges in sensors for measurement accuracy and precision, and subsequent data analysis, analytics and reliability modelling.

Fill out the form to download the PDFs in "Access 2022 Archive".

  • Dates: 8, 15, and 22 November, 2022
  • Language: English
  • Type: Technology Days
  • Length: 3 days
  • Location: Online

Presenters from

Day 1 - Electric Vehicle Battery Modelling and Powertrain Testing

Explode view of electric vehicle chassis equipped with battery pack on the road. 3D rendering image from HBK

Session 1: Electric Vehicle Battery Characterisation, Modelling and Simulation

Understanding and characterising battery performance is critical for electric vehicle development. This learning is established from multiple sources including laboratory testing, real-world vehicle fleets, physics and chemistry simulation models, and statistical and machine learning models.

These presentations describe predictive battery analytics, characterisation of lithium-ion cells and measuring battery capacity fading using force transducers.

Dr. Matthias Simolka, Technical Solution Engineering, TWAICE

The change to electromobility continues to pick up speed, ensuring that one component is at the center of attention: the battery. It is both the enabler and Achilles heel of the transition from ICE to EV. Batteries are used in various applications with significantly different requirements and many diverse environmental conditions. Predicting the behavior of batteries with different cell chemistries and formats when impacted by these parameters is challenging. Hence, different individual approaches for battery simulations exist. Combining some of these individual approaches can have a strong impact on the overall model performance.

TWAICE enables the automotive industry to step up its battery game – generate more value with batteries by simulating before start of production and by enhancing after-sales services with our predictive battery analytics. We will shed some light on the benefits of semi-empirical and machine learning models as well as their combination – we call this a hybrid model.

 

Dr. Patrick (Peng) Xiao, Lead Engineer – Battery Cell Chemistry, Jaguar Land Rover

As the evolution of the cell is moving fast forward with advanced chemistry, formats, capturing the key characteristics of the cell’s performance becomes critical to cell integration into the Pack. Those key characteristics include cell’s fundamental performance such as capacity, DCIR, cycle life & storage life as well thermal properties, safeties under extreme use conditions or abuse conditions.

A suite of characterization is introduced how Jaguar Land Rover cell team are capturing those key characteristics as the cell testing & validation methods. Those key characteristics are providing a full spectrum of the information of cells’ interfaces in the Pack.

Mr. Thomas Kleckers, Product and Application Manager - Force Transducers, HBK 

Electric cars play an important role in the decarbonization strategy of many countries. The technology has been improved in the last years, but besides the range of the car, the time required to charge an electric vehicle is also important as shorter charge stops would make them much more attractive to a wider audience. 

A shorter time with the same capacity entails operating with higher currents. Current, temperature and number of cycles are the most important factors that influence capacity fading, meaning the decrease of the capacity of a lithium-ion battery. 

Traditionally, battery tests are performed by measuring voltage and current. A more innovative method is to measure the force of a lithium-ion pack while charging or discharging processes in a fixed position. Using a suitable load cell, the test can be performed at various temperatures, and long-term tests are possible as well.

The requirements the force transducer must meet are given by the nature of the testing procedure: The long duration requires a low drift, and possible harsh environments make a hermetically sealed load cell necessary. Recent load cells are extremely accurate sensors, but as with every measurement, a certain measurement uncertainty occurs with a battery test as well. 

This lecture will discuss the most important technical aspects for choosing a suitable load cell for a “punch cell test”, and you will also learn how to do an easy calculation to get a good estimation of the measurement uncertainty.

Session 2: Electric Vehicle Powertrain Testing, Measurement and Analysis

Testing electrical machines and electrical powertrains is a key task in developing the electric future of industry and transportation. To increase efficiency, acoustic quality, durability and reliability of next-generation electrical machines and drives, used in cars, other land vehicles, air vehicles and marine vehicles, requires testing with accuracy and precision, and analysis capability to characterise their steady state and dynamic operational conditions.

These presentations describe using electrical characteristics to identify motor degradation and failure, acoustic quality at end-of-line testing, efficiency characterisation by instantaneous power calculations.

Electric SUV (generic design) with battery packs composited in transparent mode. 3D rendering image from HBK

Mr. Mitch Marks, Business Development Manager - EPT, Electrification, HBK 

Electric motors and powertrains present new challenges for durability testing and understanding the physics of failure. Traditional acceleration methods of running at an increased temperature are often not possible because the motor and inverter cannot survive them.

Motors also introduce new failure modes like demagnetization, delamination, and turn-to-turn shorts amongst others. These failures will result in mechanical failure modes but can be more easily monitored and understood through electrical measurements.

This session will discuss the failure modes of electric motors, the benefits of measuring electrical values for durability testing and give real data from durability testing.

Dr. Holger Behme-Jahns, Head of Project Engineering and Acoustics, Discom GmbH

Acoustical quality has become an increasingly important topic over the last few years. Customers expect technology to be not only reliable but also sustainable, well-designed and quiet. Especially in the automotive industry, the change toward electric mobility shifted customer expectations from roaring engine power sound to silent gliding. This leads to ever-increasing requirements for acoustic quality testing in production, not only in R&D.

A well-designed acoustic analysis for end-of-line testing can do much more than simply find “loud” units. By using constructive information about the device under test, irregular noises can be attributed to specific parts and root causes, enabling efficient repair. Combining results from actual drive tests in cars with limits derived from production statistics, it is possible to identify units which would lead to customer complaints and as well units which have hidden production defects. Long-term statistical analysis of production data expands the scope from the single device under test towards the whole production process with trends and hidden correlations.

This presentation will show the current state of end-of-line acoustic production testing with a focus on automotive powertrain applications and on the Discom production test system.

Dr. Andrew Halfpenny, Director of Technology, HBK nCode Products
  • Do you struggle explaining the difference between ‘active’, ‘reactive’ and ‘apparent’ power, in a way that colleagues can understand?
  • Do they keep asking you why ‘phase-related reactive power’ should be separate from ‘frequency-related reactive power’?
  • Does your line manager understand why dynamic power analysis and optimisation of variable speed electrical machines used in EVs, is so much more complicated than constant speed machines used in a factory?
  • Would you like a nice story with pictures to replace pages of differential calculus?

If you are an Automotive or Mechanical Engineer who wants a conceptual understanding of dynamic AC power analysis, or an electrical engineer who wants a non-mathematical refresher, then this presentation is for you!

Speakers

Black and white portrait of Matthias Simolka, Technical Solution Engineering at TWAICE

Dr. Matthias Simolka, Technical Solution Engineering, TWAICE

Dr. Matthias Simolka is Technical Solution Engineering at TWAICE. In this capacity, Matthias bridges the gap between Sales, Product and Tech, working with all teams to ensure maximum value and the optimal solution is delivered to battery customers. TWAICE supports enterprises across industries with predictive battery analytics software based on digital twins.

Prior to joining TWAICE, Matthias was working several years in academic research focusing on the aging mechanisms of modern Li-ion batteries. His research combined material analysis down to the nanometer scale with system level observations to link the battery behavior to actual degradation mechanisms. After the academic research, Matthias worked for a few years as a Consultant focusing on the German energy market with special attention to renewable energies and energy storage technologies and their applications.

Black and white portrait of Patrick (Peng) Xiao, Lead Engineer – Battery Cell Chemistry at Jaguar Land Rover

Dr. Patrick (Peng) Xiao, Lead Engineer – Battery Cell Chemistry, Jaguar Land Rover 

Dr. Peng Xiao, also known as Patrick Xiao in Jaguar Land Rover. Patrick Xiao works in Jaguar Land Rover as a Battery Cell Technology & Design Technical Specialist in Advanced Cell Engineering team in 2017. He looks at that cell’s interfaces within the Pack for cell integration, DFMEA, cell testing & validation, cell safety, and cell ageing. He also had the experience of Pack attributes, cooling system design, BMS control in an excursion working experience in McLaren.

Patrick Xiao has a Ph.D. in chemical in Nanyang Technological University, specializing in electrochemistry.  He also worked in CATL for cell design and prototype cell manufacturing of HEV and BEV cells before he joined Jaguar Land Rover.

Black and white portrait of Thomas Kleckers, Product and Application Manager - Force Sensors and Transducers at HBK

Thomas Kleckers, Product and Application Manager - Force Sensors and Transducers, HBK

Thomas Kleckers studied at the university for applied science in Duisburg and holds a diploma in physical engineering. He started working for HBM in 1992 as a development engineer for strain gauges with a focus on experimental stress analysis. Since 2009 Thomas has been the responsible Product Manager for force sensors at HBK.  With more than 25 years of experience in the field of measurement of mechanical quantities, Thomas brings much experience with the application of strain gauges and strain gauge-based sensors.  He has published several articles about transfer standards for force in the IMEKO organization and worked actively on the standard for characterization of strain gauges. 


Black and white portrait of Mitch Marks, Business Development Manager - EPT (Electric Power Testing), Electrification at HBK

Mitch Marks, Business Development Manager - EPT, Electrification, HBK

Mitch has worked in electric motor developing and testing his entire career and specializes in test and measurement traction motors and drives. He has been with HBK since 2017 as a member of the electric power testing team. He has an undergraduate and a master’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Wisconsin – Madison WEMPEC program.


Black and white portrait of a man's silhouette

Dr. Holger Behme-Jahns, Head of Project Engineering and Acoustics, Discom GmbH

Dr. Behme-Jahns has a PhD in Physics, graduating from Göttingen University. He joined Discom in 1995 as first employee to founder, Dr. Thomas Lewien, and has worked as technology and software developer, consultant, sales and many other roles during the growth of Discom. He currently heads the Project Engineering team at Discom which adapts our solution to customer needs, develops new approaches and supports our customers with training and consultancy.


Black and white portrait of Andrew Halfpenny, Director of Technology of the HBK nCode Products

Dr. Andrew Halfpenny, Director of Technology, HBK nCode Products

Dr. Halfpenny has a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from University College London (UCL) and a Masters’ in Civil and Structural Engineering. With over 25 years of experience in structural dynamics, vibration, fatigue and fracture, he has introduced many new technologies to the industry including: FE-based vibration fatigue analysis, crack growth simulation and accelerated vibration testing. He holds a European patent for the ‘Damage monitoring tag’ and developed the new vibration standard used for qualifying UK military helicopters. He has worked in consultancy with customers across the UK, Europe, Americas and the Far East, and has written publications on Fatigue, Digital Signal Processing and Structural Health Monitoring. He sits on the NAFEMS committee for Dynamic Testing and is a guest lecturer on structural dynamics with The University of Sheffield.

Day 2 - Structural Health Monitoring - Bridges, Sensors and Analytics

engineers working in the structural health monitoring of a bridge

Session 3: Structural Health Monitoring - Bridges and Sensors

Civil infrastructure (bridges, tunnels, railways, pipelines, energy plant, process plant) are subject to operational environments and conditions that cause structural degradation through time, normal use, extreme use, accident, and potential natural disaster. Structural health monitoring (SHM) is the ability to measure and observe the response of a structure to enable early identification of deterioration through response changes.

These presentations show the value of information from SHM for emergency management, bridge inspection requirements, research for bridges as a population of structures, and optical sensor technology used in measurements for SHM systems for bridges and civil infrastructure.

Prof. Maria Pina Limongelli, Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano

The management of civil infrastructures in the aftermath of a disruptive event is a concern for decision-makers, which have to choose quickly among alternative actions with limited knowledge of the actual structural conditions. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) information can support these decisions. However, information comes with a cost and the relevant benefit must be assessed before the acquisition of the SHM system is decided.

A powerful tool to estimate the benefits and optimize the SHM system design for specific applications is the Value of Information (VoI) analysis based on pre-posterior Bayesian analysis.  In the presentation, the theory will be shortly described and demonstrated through a couple of exemplary case studies.

Dr. David Hester, Senior Lecturer in Structural Engineering, School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast 

Bridges are an interesting set of structures from the point of view of infrastructure management. Firstly, they are a diverse set of structures, and secondly, they individually experience significant variation in the environmental conditions and loading.

The aim of this presentation is to provide an overview of how bridges are managed, the kind of sensing/monitoring that is sometimes undertaken and the trajectory of research in this area.

Initially, we look at how short to medium-span bridges are typically managed via periodic visual inspections. Subsequently, the presentation gives a sense of the kind of monitoring that has been used on bridges, as well as some of the sensing and data processing challenges that exist. Finally, the presentation looks at some of the very latest research in particular the idea of looking at bridges, or subsets of bridges, as a population of structures.

Cristina Barbosa, Product Manager Optical Business, HBK FiberSensing

Structural Health Monitoring systems aim to control the integrity of a structure throughout its service life so that planned maintenance and serviceability extension safely maximize this asset's profitability. Monitoring systems are expected to reliably operate through long periods and resist extreme events.

The use of optical sensors based on Fiber Bragg Grating technology is becoming an interesting choice for Structural Monitoring Systems. In this presentation, you will learn about the technology, product possibilities and current state of the art.

The main challenges we are facing when monitoring civil structures will be identified and we will show how using optical technology can support overcoming them with concrete application examples. 

Session 4: Structural Health Monitoring - Data Analytics

The value of structural health monitoring (SHM) is realised through analysis of structural response measurements. Such analyses can include structural characterisation, identification of trends and divergence from trends, calculation of cumulative usage indicators, predictive estimation of remaining structural life and more. These data analytics quantify the overall structural condition to inform decision making for continual safe operation, predictive maintenance planning, and replacement planning.

Successful and efficient implementation of SHM data analytics requires many steps from measurement data acquisition, validation & cleaning, database ingress, calculating operational parameters from physical and statistical models, investigative and retrospective analysis, visualisation and reporting.

These presentations show applications of such models with machine learning for SHM of bridges and civil infrastructure, certification of machine learning for remaining useful life of aircraft landing gear, and SHM of railway infrastructure and rail vehicles.

grey rail in a curved track, with wheels and overhead line infrastructure outlined

Prof. Elizabeth Cross, Dynamics Research Group, University of Sheffield

Structural Health Monitoring as a research field began by studying physical models for systems, comparing modelled and monitored response to understand observed behaviours. As sensing technology advanced and monitoring data became more readily available, many practitioners and researchers adopted a purely data-driven approach capitalising also on technology enhancement from the machine learning field.

Today, where we would like to be able to automatically assess the health of our structures across their operational envelope, we find that despite these advances, we often lack data that represent all behaviours of interest, thereby precluding an entirely data-driven approach.

In this talk, we will discuss the development of a physics-informed approach to machine learning for structural health monitoring. This fast-growing area of research attempts to build our engineering knowledge of a system, alleviating some burden on data acquisition and increasing model interpretability.

Haroun El Mir, PhD Researcher, Transport Systems, Cranfield University

Landing gear systems on Aircraft undergo a multitude of forces during their life cycle, leading to the eventual replacement of this system based on a ‘safe life’ approach that certain circumstances underestimate the component’s remaining useful life.

The efficacy of fatigue life approximation methodologies is studied and compared to the ongoing Structural Health Monitoring techniques being researched, which will forecast failures based on the system’s specific life and withstanding abilities, ranging from creating a digital twin to applying neural network technologies, in order to simulate and approximate locations and levels of failure along the structure.

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (AI) allows for the ease of integration of Deep Neural Network (DNN) data into predictive maintenance, which is a procedure focused on the health of a system and its efficient upkeep via the use of sensor-based data.

Test data from a flight includes a multitude of conditions and varying parameters such as the surface of the landing strip as well as the aircraft itself, requiring the use of DNN models for damage assessment and failure anticipation, where compliance to standards is a major question raised, as the EASA AI roadmap is followed, as well as the ICAO and FAA.

This presentation additionally discusses the challenges faced with respect to standardizing the explainable AI methodologies and their parameters specifically for the case of landing gear.

Dietmar Maicz, Railway and Infrastructure Monitoring Expert, HBK

With the help of HBK's TSI-Spot® (Single Point Of Truth) concept, railroad companies are enabled to obtain a holistic view of vehicles and infrastructure. New measurement methods and data processing methods allow the early detection of unnecessary wear and deviations on vehicles (wheels and pantograph) and infrastructure (superstructure and overhead line) in real-time and, thanks to the high data quality, to derive reliable, fully automated forecasts for future plannable maintenance interventions.

Maintenance planning receives daily updated information about the track condition and the individual reaction of a vehicle type in real-time. HBK's high-precision, compact and cost-effective measurement technology, combined with state-of-the-art software solutions, enables fully autonomous measurement of the relevant permanent way and overhead line parameters in real-time.

Speakers

Black and white portrait of Maria Pina Limongelli, Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering from the Politecnico di Milano, Italy

Prof. Maria Pina Limongelli, Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano

Prof. Maria Pina Limongelli is Associate professor of Structural and seismic engineering at Politecnico di Milano and Guest Professor of Digital Structural Health Monitoring and Integrity Management at Lund University in Sweden. She holds a M.S. (1991) in Structural Engineering and a Ph.D. (1995) in Seismic Engineering. Her primary research interests are related to Value of SHM information analysis, Vibration-based monitoring, and SHM standardization. She is author of more than 200 scientific peer-reviewed papers and participates, with leading roles, in several national and international funded projects Structural Health Monitoring and performance assessment of roadway bridges. She coordinates activities in several committees, and associations such as ISHMII, fib, IABSE, and JCSS.

Black and white portrait of a man's silhouette

Dr. David Hester, Senior Lecturer in Structural Engineering, School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast 

After completing my undergrad I worked for 8 years as a bridge designer/inspector. This prompted my interest in bridge Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) and I completed my PhD on the topic in University College Dublin. Since joining QUB my research interest has been on practical ways of collecting bridge data and how to exploit this data for decision making. In particular, through a collaboration with Electrical and Electronic Engineers, I am working on innovative autonomous bridge monitoring functionality. I have published extensively in the area (34 journal and 38 conference papers) with 1,035 citations and an H-index of 19. I have been PI or Co-I on grants worth over £2 million to the University.

Black and white portrait of Cristina Barbosa, Product Manager Optical Business at HBK FiberSensing

Cristina Barbosa, Product Manager Optical Business, HBK FiberSensing

Cristina Barbosa is the Product Manager for HBK Optical Business since 2015, but her work with Fiber Bragg Grating technology started more than 15 years ago, soon after graduating from the Faculty of Engineering of Porto University as a Civil Engineer. Since then, she has been working in FiberSensing, currently HBK FiberSensing, taking different responsibilities from application engineering to sales, with important support to marketing activities.

Black and white portrait of professor Elizabeth Cross, Dynamics Research Group at the University of Sheffield

Prof. Elizabeth Cross, Dynamics Research Group, University of Sheffield

Lizzy Cross is Head of the Department of Mechanical Engineering and a Professor in the Dynamics Research Group at the University of Sheffield with a research focus on advanced data analysis and machine learning for Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) and nonlinear system identification. She has just completed an EPSRC Innovation Fellowship pioneering physics-informed machine learning for structural dynamics. Lizzy is a co-director of the Laboratory for Verification and Validation, a state-of-the-art dynamic testing facility (lvv.ac.uk). She has published over 140 articles, including 45 journal papers, 6 invited book chapters. She was recently awarded the Achenbach medal which recognises an individual (within 10 years of PhD) who has made an outstanding contribution to the advancement of the field of SHM.

Black and white portrait of Haroun El Mir, PhD Researcher, Transport Systems at the Cranfield University

Haroun El Mir, PhD Researcher, Transport Systems, Cranfield University

Haroun completed his BSc in Mechanical Engineering at the American University of Sharjah, with a focus on Aircraft Stability & Propulsion. He worked right after as a research assistant in Composite Materials with a Publication on "Improving the buckling strength of honeycomb cores".  Moving thereon to Cranfield University for an MSc in Aerospace Vehicle Design with a concentration in Avionics Systems Design, he focused on Landing Gear fatigue prediction using modelling and FE software, later pursuing a PhD in Transport Systems, seeking the continuation of his MSc Thesis and integrating it with a neural network approach & application in SHM.

Black and white portrait of Dietmar Maicz, Railway and Infrastructure Monitoring Expert at HBK

Dietmar Maicz, Railway and Infrastructure Monitoring Expert, HBK

Studied industrial engineering and mechanical engineering, majoring in transport engineering and majoring in production engineering at Graz University of Technology.

Since 2003 working in the field of measurement technology for Asset Health Monitoring and Predictive Maintenance.

Day 3 - Reliability of Electric Systems and Fault Tree Analysis

generic electric car with battery visible x-ray charging at a public charger in city parking lot with lens flare 3d render. Reliability of Electric Systems, session 5 from day 3 of the 2022 HBK Technology Days.

Session 5: Reliability of Electric Systems

The increasing electrification of transport systems presents many challenges to achieving the desired reliability of these electric vehicles and their electric power systems, to mitigate both a safety risk and warranty exposure. They require convergence and conversion between mechanical power and electrical power. Some failure modes and reliability models carry over from predominantly mechanical powered vehicles, whilst new failure modes are created, requiring identification and quantification through testing, simulation and validation.

These presentations show building a reliability validation plan for the automotive electric powertrain, statistical and reliability methods for determining electric vehicle system reliability, and why aviation needs more reliable and standardised electrical testing for the shift to more-electric aircraft. 

Andrew Brown, Reliability & Validation Methods Chapter Lead, Jaguar Land Rover

The transition from ICE to EV powertrains has been rapid and the array of configurations including Mild-Hybrid (MHEV), Plug-In Hybrid (PHEV) and fully Electric (BEV) creates a multitude of customer use-cases that need to be accounted for in the validation plan.

The relative cost of failure has more than doubled for the electrified powertrain, and the warranty period of high-cost systems (such as the battery) extends beyond the conventional 3 years, putting more emphasis on reliability improvements of the powertrain.

Dr. Suresh Perinpanayagam, Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM) Centre, Cranfield University

Prognostics-enabled electrification should lead to high reliability, low maintenance (via only repair or replacement during scheduled maintenance) and uptake of more electrical systems for primary controls.

This presentation proposes a radically new approach to reliable system design to improve the robustness of complex electrical and electronics systems in aerospace and automotive applications by means of intelligent prognostics for extending the usable life.

More robustness is mostly required in applications where reliability and system health management are important or critical, such as automotive industries and aeronautics. It will provide a new source of an advanced supervisory unit to quantify the practicality of implementing prognostics tools in powertrains to detect the degradation and estimate their remaining life-time.

Dr. Andrew Halfpenny, Director of Technology, HBK nCode Products

The automotive industry is mobilizing at a rapid pace to meet the demands and challenges presented by the shift to more widely accepted battery-powered electric vehicles. The rapid pace of innovation can expose manufacturers to potentially expensive warranty claims.

This presentation addresses techniques to quantify and minimize reliability exposure for structural EV battery systems. It covers the following topics:

  • Understanding the impact of mechanical shock, vibration, and thermal stresses, on the durability and reliability of EV batteries.
  • Obtaining statistically representative loading spectra, and deriving vibration test profiles.
  • Using a combination of physical vibration testing with CAE simulation to better understand component reliability and the impact of uncertainty on risk exposure.

Session 6: Reliability Fault Tree Analysis

Fault tree analysis is one of any symbolic analytical logic techniques found in operations research, system reliability analysis, risk analysis and other disciplines. A fault tree diagram follows a top-down structure and represents a graphical model of the pathways within a system that can lead to a foreseeable, undesirable loss event (or a failure). The pathways interconnect contributory events and conditions using standard logic gates (AND, OR, etc). Analysts may wish to use fault trees in combination with reliability block diagrams for system analysis. Fault trees may also be useful for analysing the effects of individual failure modes and in conjunction with FMEA.

These presentations introduce fault tree analysis to identify the critical path, and their use in combination with reliability block diagrams to understand and improve a system, followed by their application to tens of thousands of assets for advanced reliability analysis and reliability digital twins.

Reliability fault tree analysis from a desktop perspective

Mr. Chris Wynn-Jones, Application Engineer – Reliability, HBK

A fault tree is used to identify the critical path/s in a process, system or service. This introduction will focus on two different views, top down and bottom up.

Top Down

  • This view is read downwards, from undesirable events down to the lowest known fault/cause branch item.
  • All the undesirable events that can result from your Process, System or Service, are driven by something that is no longer working correctly. 
  • Engineers use this mentality to discover weaknesses in their Process, System or Service to calculate the probability of failure and occurrence. 

Bottom Up

  • This view is read upwards, from the fault/cause up to their end effect. 
  • All known faults/causes have an undesirable end effect on the Process, System or Service. 
  • Using mixed modelling it is possible to combine faults/causes, build in redundancy and/or identify standbys (a mitigating action) enabling reliability and probability of failure to be calculated for known end effects.

 

Mr. Sam Eisenberg, Product Manager, HBK ReliaSoft Products

This presentation will explore how best to use fault tree analyses to uncover and surface your primary unreliability drivers in your system.

We will explore the methodologies and next steps once you have identified the bad actors in your system.

Mr. Adi Dhora, Engineering Solutions, Reliability Solutions Consultant, HBK & 
Mr. Eric Fritts, Engineering Solutions, Project Engineer, HBK

This presentation describes a practical approach to use automation for creating reliability models, simulations, and insights for a large number of assets. Most industries are looking to pursue more data-driven reliability practices. Most reliability practitioners highly value the insights they gain from fault tree analysis and reliability block diagrams.

However, often a limiting factor is data access, quality, and personnel time to process large quantities of data. This is where automation can help to enable reliability practitioners to focus majority of their time on analysis and decisions.

This presentation will showcase how best to merge automation with reliability-know-how to scale in-depth analysis like reliability predictions and event probability for tens of thousands of assets in a short timeframe.

Speakers

Black and white portrait of Andrew Brown, Reliability & Validation Methods Chapter Lead at Jaguar Land Rover

Andrew Brown, Reliability & Validation Methods Chapter Lead, Jaguar Land Rover

Andrew graduated from Sheffield University in 2006 with a degree in Aerospace Engineering. Since then, he has worked in product development of Internal Combustion Engines, starting his career working on large diesel gensets for Perkins Engines and then transferring to Automotive ICE engine development at JLR. Andrew began working in the field of Reliability and Validation Methodology for base engines back in 2016, before leading the validation team on the new Range Rover PHEV battery (the first in-house developed battery at JLR). More recently he has transferred to a lead role in the Validation Methods & Reliability Technical Chapter, responsible for developing common Reliability Engineering practices for the Electric Propulsion System.

Black and white portrait of Suresh Perinpanayagam from the Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM) Centre at the Cranfield University

Dr. Suresh Perinpanayagam, Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM) Centre, Cranfield University

Dr Suresh Perinpanayagam leads the Prognostic Health Management Group, part of the Boeing Integrated Vehicle Health Management Research Centre set up by The Boeing Company. Suresh has a research group of 14 researchers and manages grants amounting to £1.6M from the industry. Suresh obtained his Master's in Engineering and PhD in Engineering at Imperial College, London. Suresh has spent considerable time in the industry working on various industrial R&D projects.

The PHM group links many of the UK’s high-value-added electronic system manufacturers, including Airbus, Boeing, Thales, BAE Systems, Meggitt, Safran, and Rolls Royce. Suresh has published over 90 peer-reviewed journal and conference papers. He has successfully completed the supervision of eighteen Master’s theses and one PhD thesis.

Suresh is a member of the working group developing the IEEE Standard for Prognostics and Health Management. He has published one book chapter on ‘Sensors, Instrumentation and Signal Processing’ in the SAE International book on Integrated Vehicle Health Management and numerous research papers.

Black and white portrait of Andrew Halfpenny, Director of Technology of the HBK nCode Products

Dr. Andrew Halfpenny, Director of Technology, HBK nCode Products

Dr. Halfpenny has a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from University College London (UCL) and a Masters’ in Civil and Structural Engineering. With over 25 years of experience in structural dynamics, vibration, fatigue and fracture, he has introduced many new technologies to the industry including: FE-based vibration fatigue analysis, crack growth simulation and accelerated vibration testing. He holds a European patent for the ‘Damage monitoring tag’ and developed the new vibration standard used for qualifying UK military helicopters. He has worked in consultancy with customers across the UK, Europe, Americas and the Far East, and has written publications on Fatigue, Digital Signal Processing and Structural Health Monitoring. He sits on the NAFEMS committee for Dynamic Testing and is a guest lecturer on structural dynamics with The University of Sheffield.

Black and white portrait of Chris Wynn-Jones, Application Engineer – Reliability at HBK

Mr. Chris Wynn-Jones, Application Engineer – Reliability, HBK

Christopher Wynn-Jones has a BEng (Hons) in Mechanical Engineering from University of Wolverhampton coupled with 25 years of engineering experience. After various manufacturing roles Chris went on to become a Safety and Reliability Engineer for civil and military products in the air, at sea and ground vehicles. He is an Application Engineer for ReliaSoft reliability software, supporting customers in industry and in universities with software solutions and best practices in Engineering for Reliability.

Chris also sits on the WG1 committee of the Institute of Mechanical Engineers [IMechE] Safety and Reliability Group (SRG). The SRG group promotes the development of safety and reliability requirements for products such as equipment, systems or services.

Black and white portrait of Sam Eisenberg, Product Manager of the HBK ReliaSoft Products

Sam Eisenberg, Product Manager, HBK ReliaSoft Products

Sam Eisenberg is the Product Manager for ReliaSoft Products and the Product Owner for ReliaSoft Desktop Products. Sam has been working with ReliaSoft since 2010, beginning with Technical Support, moving into the Application Engineer role, and then taking on the Product Manager / Product Owner roles.

Black and white portrait of Adi Dhora,
Engineering Solutions, Reliability Solutions Consultant at HBK

Mr Adi Dhora, Engineering Solutions, Reliability Solutions Consultant, HBK 

As a Reliability Solutions Consultant, Adi Dhora specializes in implementing data-driven methodologies to improve the reliability of critical assets for various industries. He has a background in mechanical engineering and has assisted many leading industrial companies in implementing reliability programs. 

Black and white portrait of Eric Fritts, Engineering Solutions, Project Engineer at HBK

Mr Eric Fritts, Engineering Solutions, Project Engineer, HBK

Eric Fritts is a Project Engineer at HBK and regularly tackles industry problems with his know-how in reliability analysis, failure propagation and mitigation and the ancillary/logistical impacts of component failure. He has experience across private sector heavy industry and military. He has a background in Automation Engineering and Software Engineering.

Related HBK Technology Days

close
close

Access 2022 Technology Days Archive