Training | Resources

arrow_back_ios

Main Menu

arrow_back_ios

Main Menu

See All Acoustic End-of-Line Test Systems See All DAQ and instruments See All Electroacoustics See All Software See All Transducers See All Vibration Testing Equipment See All Academy See All Resource Center See All Applications See All Industries See All Insights See All Services See All Support See All Our Business See All Our History See All Our Sustainability Commitment See All Global Presence
arrow_back_ios

Main Menu

See All Actuators See All Combustion Engines See All Durability See All eDrive See All Transmission & Gearboxes See All Turbo Charger See All DAQ Systems See All High Precision and Calibration Systems See All Industrial electronics See All Power Analyser See All S&V Hand-held devices See All S&V Signal conditioner See All Accessories See All DAQ Software See All Drivers & API See All nCode - Durability and Fatigue Analysis See All ReliaSoft - Reliability Analysis and Management See All Test Data Management See All Utility See All Vibration Control See All Acoustic See All Current / voltage See All Displacement See All Load Cells See All Pressure See All Strain Gauges See All Torque See All Vibration See All LDS Shaker Systems See All Power Amplifiers See All Vibration Controllers See All Accessories for Vibration Testing Equipment See All Training Courses See All Whitepapers See All Acoustics See All Asset & Process Monitoring See All Custom Sensors See All Data Acquisition & Analysis See All Durability & Fatigue See All Electric Power Testing See All NVH See All Reliability See All Smart Sensors See All Vibration See All Weighing See All Automotive & Ground Transportation See All Calibration See All Installation, Maintenance & Repair See All Support Brüel & Kjær See All Release Notes See All Compliance See All Our People
arrow_back_ios

Main Menu

See All CANHEAD See All GenHS See All LAN-XI See All MGCplus See All Optical Interrogators See All QuantumX See All SomatXR See All Fusion-LN See All Accessories See All Hand-held Software See All Accessories See All BK Connect / Pulse See All API See All Microphone Sets See All Microphone Cartridges See All Acoustic Calibrators See All Special Microphones See All Microphone Pre-amplifiers See All Sound Sources See All Accessories for acoustic transducers See All Experimental testing See All Transducer Manufacturing (OEM) See All Accessories See All Non-rotating (calibration) See All Rotating See All CCLD (IEPE) accelerometers See All Charge Accelerometers See All Impulse hammers / impedance heads See All Cables See All Accessories See All Electroacoustics See All Noise Source Identification See All Environmental Noise See All Sound Power and Sound Pressure See All Noise Certification See All Industrial Process Control See All Structural Health Monitoring See All Electrical Devices Testing See All Electrical Systems Testing See All Grid Testing See All High-Voltage Testing See All Vibration Testing with Electrodynamic Shakers See All Structural Dynamics See All Machine Analysis and Diagnostics See All Process Weighing See All Calibration Services for Transducers See All Calibration Services for Handheld Instruments See All Calibration Services for Instruments & DAQ See All On-Site Calibration See All Resources See All Software License Management
HBK Technology Days 2023

2023 HBK Technology Days | Archive

This 6-part series of 90-minute virtual seminars focuses on material and fatigue performance for structural durability – from material coupon testing to full structure testing.

Day 1 – Structural Testing and Vibration Testing

Explode view of electric vehicle chassis equipped with battery pack on the road. 3D rendering image.

Session 1: Aircraft Structural Testing

Fatigue testing full scale airframe and large structural components require significant investment and resources for long durations. To reduce this duration, AIRBUS will describe the “Rapid EF” industry and university collaborative research programme. The Rapid EF objective is to shorten multi-year duration fatigue tests, to reduce overall aircraft development cycle time from a minimum of 8 years to less than 5 years. This is followed by the HBK contributions to Rapid EF, to reduce measurement setup time and reduce downtime in the DAQ measurement chain.

The session closes with University of Sheffield research to construct a structural dynamics digital twin of a Hawk T1A aircraft, to identify the outstanding questions and challenges to direct future efforts by academia and industry.

#1: The “Rapid EF” project for Accelerated Full-Scale Fatigue Testing

Marco Wagner, Measurement and Control System Engineer, Airbus

AIRBUS desire to shorten their product development cycle, to become more agile to better adapt to market demands. Rapid EF (Rapid Essais de Fatigue ) is a LuFo [*] funded aviation research programme to significantly accelerate full-scale airframe fatigue testing. The biggest testing challenge to fulfil LuFo goals is to shorten multi-year duration fatigue tests to reduce the overall development cycle time from a minimum of 8 years to less than 5 years. Rapid EF aims to reduce a fatigue test by reducing setup time (quicker instrumentation), cycle time (improved control algorithms) and downtime (anticipation of damage through digital twin). Rapid EF is a collaboration led by AIRBUS with project partners: IZfP (Fraunhofer), ZEISS (gom), Applus+ (IMA), DLR, ifas (University of Aachen) and HBK. 

[*] LuFo (Luftfahrtforschungsprogramm) is a German funding programme for aviation research, led by the German Aerospace Center DLR (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt). LuFo VI-2 Global Goals include environmentally friendly aviation, future mobility, hybrid-electric aviation, alternative propulsion, hydrogen fuel cells, supplier diversification, digitalization and more.

 

 #2 HBK contributions to Rapid EF to reduce test downtime

Sandro Di Natale, Product and Application Manager - Test and Measurement, HBK

Rapid EF aims to reduce the fatigue test by reducing setup time (quicker instrumentation), cycle time (improved control algorithms) and downtime (anticipation of damage through digital twin). HBK contributions to Rapid EF are mainly responsible for reducing downtime. This presentation will address these challenges and their solutions including:

- to provide redundancy in the DAQ measurement chain to avoid or reduce single point failures;

- to provide quick exchange in the DAQ measurement chain when required to avoid DAQ shutdown and reboot;

- to provide an open DAQ architecture enable inclusion of tactile sensors, optical & thermal cameras, sound, etc.;

- to automate and simplify sensor parameterisation, particularly for the 100’s or 1000’s of strain gauges required;

- to quantify and minimize measurement uncertainty;

- to provide virtual sensors to complement physical sensors for digital twin model correlation;

- to provide measurement data streams for subsequent automated cleansing, analytics and data management.

Download the PDF here download

Dr. Timothy Rogers, Senior Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield

This presentation will look at recent work carried out at The University of Sheffield Laboratory for Verification and Validation ( https://lvv.ac.uk/) , in which the dynamics of a Hawk T1A aircraft were investigated with the aim of constructing a digital twin of this legacy asset. The understanding of this aircraft has been approached, in this project, from the viewpoint of structural dynamics. In the presentation the setup of these tests and subsequent analysis will be discussed. 

Rather than providing a blueprint for the construction of aerospace digital twins, this presentation will outline some of the outstanding questions and challenges with an aim to initiate discussion on where future efforts by academia and industry might be directed.

Download the PDF here download

Session 2: Electric Vehicle Battery Vibration Testing

The qualification of many products, components and systems require shock and vibration testing to demonstrate their ability to meet performance requirements. National and International Standards define shock and vibration tests for many industries requiring a wide range of vibration test procedures. An electrodynamic shaker is at the centre of many vibration test systems. HBK will introduce vibration test systems and electrodynamic shakers, and then describe in more detail the high shock and high force shakers required to test EV (electric vehicle) battery packs and EV assemblies. AVL will extend this EV battery vibration testing application to a holistic test environment with all required subsystems integrated into a working vibration test system.

The session closes with HBK describing the complementarity of numerical simulation and physical testing and using fatigue equivalent methods to compare and tailor vibration tests, to decrease or increase test duration.

Explode view of electric vehicle chassis equipped with battery pack on the road. 3D rendering image.

Tim Gardiner, Product Manager - Vibration Test Systems, HBK

Vibration testing aims to reduce the risk of product failing in the field by simulating the vibration conditions that products are exposed to during their lifetime. Test specifications define the applied vibration levels. It is a crucial process in various industries, including aerospace, automotive, and telecommunications, where the failure of mechanical and electronic systems can have severe consequences.

This presentation will describe shaker systems and introduce vibration testing and the theory behind it. A wide range of shaker solutions are required to meet many different industry challenges and applications within this fast evolving test arena.

A summary of topics include:

  1. Electrodynamic shakers – the what and the how;
  2. Brief range overview;
  3. Applications overview;
  4. Combined vibration testing of EV batteries.
Download the PDF here download

Armin Karner, Senior Application Manager, AVL List GmbH

Vibration and specific mechanical shock testing are important for battery development. For us at AVL, it is important to not only understand the battery shaker, but also to focus on our customer’s application use cases to tailor our offerings accordingly.

A holistic test environment with all required subsystems integrated into a working test system is essential. With our experience of existing labs and design studies, we support our customers from application to real test lab. We can even provide complete turnkey solutions to ensure a fast and efficient start-up. AVL's outstanding safety system underlines our extensive experience in battery testing and provides a safe and easy to use test environment.

This presentation describes what is needed from a test system perspective and gives an overview of how we can support our customers on their successful journey.

Download the PDF here download

Dr. Frédéric Kihm, Product Manager – Analytics and Signal Processing, HBK

This presentation will cover various topics around endurance vibration testing. In the first part of the presentation, we will look specifically at the vibration profile : how to create one from measurements, how to compare several profiles in terms of severity – especially if they are of different natures. We will understand how to scale up the profile to reduce the test duration or to scale it down to increase the test duration.

In the second part, we will discuss the complementarity of numerical simulation and physical testing, especially in cases where a component is responding dynamically to random excitations. We will insist on how CAE can enrich testing and vice versa. This will include the use of virtual sensors for test- CAE correlation and modal analysis for damping values and mode shapes.

Download the PDF here download

Day 2 – Materials Testing and Fatigue Performance

Explode view of electric vehicle chassis equipped with battery pack on the road. 3D rendering image.

Session 3: Materials Testing and Characterisation

Across all industries, it is becoming increasingly necessary to qualify components based on their reliability and risk of failure. Modern testing methods can improve fatigue prediction of engineered structures with new joining techniques, surface treatments, additively manufactured materials, and composites. The transportation industry is increasingly using novel hybrid joints in their desire for durable lightweight structures to reduce fuel consumption and emissions. The introduction of REACH regulations in Europe for protection of human health and the environment from the use of chemicals has led to the development of new surface treatment systems.

This introduces how materials strength and fatigue performance parameters can be determined and used to reduce the variability and uncertainty of fatigue life predictions. This session describes these materials testing and characterisation methods and introduces the following more detailed HBK Technology Day sessions for surface treatments, hybrid joints and use of failure mode and effect analysis to improve durability and reliability.

Dr. Andrew Halfpenny, Director of Technology – nCode Products, HBK

In the aerospace, automotive, and power generation industries, it is becoming increasingly necessary to qualify components based on their reliability or risk of failure. Fatigue design of mechanical systems has historically followed a deterministic process. That means, for a given set of input loads and component strength parameters, it will return a consistent fatigue life estimate with no variation. In reality, the input loads and component strengths are statistically variable and uncertain. They have a mean expected value, a statistical variability, and uncertainty associated with them.

This presentation considers how digital simulation, physical component testing, uncertainty analysis, and statistical reliability analysis, are used to support the fatigue design requirement, and thereby reduce a company’s exposure to unacceptable safety and warranty risks. It concludes with two cost-effective and fairly easy to implement enhancements to offer significant improvements in predicted confidence of an existing design, simulation, verification, and validation process:

  1. Additional test instrumentation applied in the qualification test to verify the simulation results;
  2. Qualification tests that must be continued to failure to verify the fatigue simulation.
Download the PDF here download

Dr. Michelle Hill, Head of Materials Testing, HBK 

Any fatigue analysis is only as good as the materials data it is based on. For durable lightweight structures made with new construction techniques or material types, it can be a challenge to find high quality fatigue data. HBK's Advanced Materials Characterisation and Testing (AMCT) facility in the UK has extensive experience in standard and novel fatigue and durability testing. This presentation will illustrate how modern testing methods can improve fatigue prediction of engineered structures with new joining techniques, additively manufactured materials, and composites.

Download the PDF here download

Dr. Andrew Halfpenny, Director of Technology – nCode Products, HBK

The structural design of mechanical systems is significantly enhanced by simulation. Fatigue simulation is conveniently divided into two stages:

  1. Stress simulation (or constitutive modelling) is the transformation of loads, through displacements, to structural stresses. A structure may respond to these loads in either a static or dynamic fashion, and the response may be linear or non-linear in its nature. The Finite Element (FE) method is most commonly used for these simulations.
  2. Materials simulation is the transformation of these structural stresses into a statistical likelihood of failure. There are often many possible failure modes, and these may be classified as either:

                2.1 Ultimate Limit State (ULS): e.g. tensile failure or buckling;

                2.2 Serviceability Limit State (SLS): e.g. material ageing or fatigue.

This presentation addresses the characterisation of increasingly complex materials. It considers the simple strength and elastic modulus values, and extends this to include the non-linear, elastic-plastic behaviour. Parameters are shown for several mathematical models depending on the complexity of the stress analysis required.

The presentation continues by covering ULS and SLS failure models. These range from traditional static failures to SN and EN fatigue models, and on to complex thermo-mechanical fatigue and creep models.

For one or more materials connected as a “joint” (bolts, rivets, welds, adhesives, etc.), mechanical testing alone is insufficient in determining their fatigue properties. In this case the term 'stress' will depend on the FE modelling strategy. Different strategies may result in different stress values. It is therefore essential that the test coupons are modelled using the same FE modelling strategy as the final components. This analysis is described in the presentation.

Finally, it becomes necessary to consider the variability of material strength and how this affects the component design. The paper concludes by considering design parameters that are suitable for both traditional Deterministic designs (i.e. safe design curves), and parameters that are suitable for Stochastic design (i.e. simulating uncertainty).

Download the PDF here download

Session 4: Fatigue Performance of Materials Surface Treatments

Many structural components have surface treatments or coatings applied to the surface of the material to help protect against environmental or in service damage. Although these coatings are themselves not structural, it is important to understand the effect of these surface treatments on the fatigue life of a material. Select Engineering Services and HBK have worked together to provide the United States Air Force with more precise predictive models for the fatigue characteristics of landing gear subject to surface treatments and coatings during design, maintenance, and overhaul. This required conducting an extensive surface treatment fatigue testing programme for 300M steel, 4340 steel and 7075 aluminium, with a wide range of surface treatments and developing a Material Assessment and Predictive Analysis (MAPA) tool to manage these. The background and requirements of this work are presented in the 2021 HBK Technology Days. This session describes the results, including the novel combination of strain-life fatigue with surface treatment factors, the MAPA tool and the inclusion of fatigue properties for these baseline materials and their surface treatments in the nCode Premium Materials Database.

Explode view of electric vehicle chassis equipped with battery pack on the road. 3D rendering image.

Dr. Michelle Hill, Head of Materials Testing, HBK
Mr. Ben Griffiths, Chief Engineer, Select Engineering Services

The Q&A for this presentation is included at the end of the recording of the 3rd presentation in this session.

Many structural components have surface treatments or coatings applied to the surface of the material to help protect against environmental or in service damage. Although these coatings are themselves not structural, it is important to understand the effect of these surface treatments on the fatigue life of a material, as significant knockdowns can be observed. The effects of historical surface treatments such as cadmium plating and chromic acid anodising have been well characterised. The introduction of REACH regulations in Europe for protection of human health and the environment from the use of chemicals has led to the development of new surface treatment systems, many of which are not well understood.

In addition to development of new treatments and coatings, there is also an ongoing requirement to extend the life of legacy components in service, where parts may have been overhauled many times. An example of such an application is the landing gears on many legacy United States Air Force aircraft. This presentation will provide an overview of material and surface treatment fatigue test and characterization approach and discuss key considerations when planning a fatigue test program.

Download the PDF here download

Dr. Andrew Halfpenny, Director of Technology – nCode Products, HBK

The Q&A for this presentation is included at the end of the recording of the 3rd presentation in this session.

The strain-life fatigue method is generally preferred for military aircraft landing gear fatigue life predictions because at the higher strain levels they experience, the stress-life fatigue method breaks down. The strain-life fatigue method requires strain controlled fatigue testing over a range of strain amplitudes and wide range of fatigue cycles to failure, followed by characterisation to fit parameters for the Ramberg-Osgood-Neuber cyclic plasticity model and Coffin-Manson-Basquin strain-life model. A minimum of 25 fatigue tests are recommended to characterise baseline material fatigue performance for a full range (102 to 107 cycles) equally biased low to high cycle strain-life curve.

The Ksur method for surface treatment factors models the fatigue effect of a surface treatment with a single Ksur parameter to adjust the slope of a stress-life fatigue curve in the high cycle region. This method was originally derived for stress-life fatigue curves and assumes that surface effects are mostly confined to the high cycle fatigue region. It is reasoned that under high cycle fatigue loading, the applied loads are relatively low and localised fatigue initiation sites are dependent on the surface condition. Fatigue testing can be reduced to a minimum of 12 because there is only a single Ksur factor parameter to fit, and tests can be biased for results in the mid to high cycle fatigue region.

This presents how strain-life fatigue parameters can be combined with Ksur surface treatment factors, including sample results and fatigue methodology validation.

Download the PDF here download

Mr. Ben Griffiths, Chief Engineer, Select Engineering Services

The Q&A for this presentation and the previous two presentations are included at the end of this recording.

SES is developing the MAPA tool to provide the United States Air Force with more precise predictive models for the fatigue characteristics of landing gear subject to surface treatments and coatings during design, maintenance, and overhaul. The MAPA tool manages raw fatigue test data and generates curve fits, strain-life parameters, and plots for rapid data mining. The MAPA tool also exports material property files formatted for direct input to nCode DesignLife for fatigue analysis.

MAPA Data Management

  • To manage all raw fatigue test data, and resultant strain-life and Ksur, fatigue parameters;
  • To compare raw data and fitted curves.

MAPA Curve Fit Editing

  • To curve fit raw fatigue test data into strain-life and Ksur, fatigue parameters;
  • To control the curve fitting process, to include/exclude data points, and to set design curve reliability and confidence levels.
Download the PDF here download

Paul Roberts, Product Manager – nCode DesignLife, HBK 

The nCode Premium Material Database (PMD) contains fatigue properties measured on materials tested at the ISO-9001 certified Advanced Materials Characterisation and Test Facility owned and operated by HBK nCode. This collection of fatigue properties contains over 150 materials, mostly commonly used types of steel and aluminium, plus some other non-ferrous materials, and includes recent additions for additively manufactured titanium and Inconel material.

From nCode 2024, the PMD will include fatigue properties for baseline materials and surface treatments resulting from work to characterise fatigue performance of aging aircraft landing gear through overhaul and maintenance cycles. The baseline materials are 300M steel, 4340 steel and 7075 aluminium, with a range of surface treatments including; electrolytic nickel, electroless nickel, cadmium and chrome coatings, and many of these with and without shot peen.

Download the PDF here download

Day 3 – Joint Testing and Fatigue Performance, and Improving Reliability with FMEA

Explode view of electric vehicle chassis equipped with battery pack on the road. 3D rendering image.

Session 5: Fatigue Testing, Simulation and Performance of Thin Sheet Joints

The use of adhesive and/or hybrid joints are increasingly popular in the transportation industry to achieve their desire for durable lightweight structures to reduce fuel consumption and emissions. To optimise the design of these joints and minimise the risk of in-service fatigue failures, requires robust and easy-to-use methods for their modelling and fatigue life estimation. This session describes how the methods developed for thin sheet welded joints, presented at the 2021 HBK Technology Days, have been extended to adhesive and/or hybrid joint. These methods include using cameras to monitor crack initiation and propagation and displacement transducers for calculating stiffness drops. These tests, coupled with finite element stress analysis to recover the needed stress, enables the transformation of high quality load-life data sets with low scatter into stress-life (SN) fatigue parameters.

The session closes with an introduction to fretting fatigue, and University of Brasilia and University of Leuven research for a new combined experimental and numerical approach to characterise and predict fretting fatigue damage accumulation under variable amplitude loading.

Alex Pierpoint, Materials Test Engineer, HBK

This work presents how the HBK methodology for fatigue testing of welded joints has been extended to adhesive and hybrid joints. The method has been successfully implemented by HBK's Advanced Materials Characterisation and Testing (AMCT) facility in the UK. The results from testing are used to derive parameters for use in nCode DesignLife fatigue analysis.

The presentation details the impact that defects in the joints can have on the amount of scatter present in the load-life data and how identifying these issues early, through a thorough pre-test inspection of the specimens, can help understand the test data.

The possibility of selecting a more representative failure criterion can sometimes aid in reducing the amount of scatter present in the load-life data when compared with using specimen separation. This is achieved through the implementation of cameras to monitor crack initiation and propagation and displacement transducers for calculating stiffness drops.

This approach enables the generation of high quality load-life data sets with low scatter. This has a beneficial impact on the quality of the fatigue parameters generated through reverse engineering the test data using finite element stress analysis results.

Download the PDF here download

Dr. Cristian Bagni, Technologist of Fatigue and Fracture, HBK

The need for more environmentally sustainable ways of transportation and for a reduction in emissions and fuel consumption make lightweight structures essential. The use of adhesive and/or hybrid joints represents one way to reduce the weight of components and it is becoming increasingly popular in the transportation industry. To optimise the design of adhesive and hybrid joints and minimise the risk of in-service fatigue failures, the transportation industry needs efficient, robust, and easy-to-use approaches for the modelling and fatigue life estimation of such joints.

This work presents a practical approach, easily adoptable by companies in the transportation industry, for estimating the fatigue life of adhesive and hybrid joints. The proposed approach includes Finite Element (FE) modelling guidelines to recover the needed stresses, that provide FE models computationally not too onerous, reasonably mesh insensitive and that do not require congruent meshes, with limited changes to the typical FE modelling strategies currently used. The fatigue life estimation is then carried out using standard SN-based nCode DesignLife analysis engines, with the stresses recovered from the FE model and bespoke SN curves obtained through testing used as inputs.

Download the PDF here download

Ph.D. André Luis Pinto, University of Brasilia

Fretting fatigue can occur in many structures, such as riveted lap-joint connections in aircraft fuselage and blade-disc connections in aircraft engines. Fretting fatigue is complex and multiaxial but is commonly simplified to constant amplitude loading, however, this condition is not the reality for many industrial applications. Recent research proposes a new experimental and numerical methodology for the life assessment of components subjected to fretting fatigue under variable amplitude loading.

Experimental tests were conducted by applying H-L (High-Low) and L-H (Low-High) alternating amplitude loading blocks to the tangential load while maintaining a constant static contact normal load, and a constant alternating amplitude bulk fatigue load. The new numerical methodology proposed for fretting fatigue life assessment includes the effects of crack nucleation, wear, and crack propagation. Crack nucleation life estimation results are compared using a traditional Miners’ linear damage accumulation and a proposed new non-linear damage model from experimental observations of H-L and L-H loading sequences.

Download the PDF here download

Session 6: Improving Reliability with FMEA

Reliability engineering uses the discipline and hierarchy of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to identify and rank potential and actual failure modes from components to systems to full asset. During development and in-service operation, test and field data for failure and survival can populate a hierarchal FMEA with quantifiable failure distributions. Early in concept design failure modes can be ranked, and plans proposed for supplementary development testing where reliability requirements are high but confidence is low because minimal data are available. During in-service operation, analyses of warranty field data can give early identification of future unreliability enabling mitigating actions to be developed and deployed.

Valeo present their application of reliability methods and tools deployed to ensure reliability of their thermal systems for new automotive electrification challenges. Valeo have collaborated with University of Bradford research to develop a model-based system engineering (MBSE) approach to automate some FMEA generation, to alleviate the traditional time and resource intensive expert-centric FMEA approach. The session closes with HBK presenting how to prioritise the tests required to mitigate reliability risk exposure by prioritising supplementary development testing.

Explode view of electric vehicle chassis equipped with battery pack on the road. 3D rendering image.

Dr. Marco Bonato, Head of Reliability and Data Analytics Expert, Valeo Thermal Systems

As a major tier1 supplier, Valeo is actively involved in the fast pace changes shaping modern automotive industries. The advent of electrification, autonomous and connected driving comes with new challenges for reliability of automotive parts. This concept of “novelty” embraces many aspects related to durability: mission profiling, failure modes detections and preventions, determination of failure root causes, physical models to accelerated design validation tests, analyses of warranty field data, development and comparison of validation specifications, testing and simulations etc.

This presentation illustrates the new methods and tools available within the reliability community that have been deployed in the recent years by Valeo. By focusing on thermal systems related components, we will emphasize the application of these so-called modern reliability tools during the whole process of product development: from concept to support phase. We will illustrate the application of the various reliability approaches grouped according to the three different branches of the discipline: experimental, predictive, and operational reliability.

Several case studies will illustrate the deployment of the new techniques:

  • Monitoring of product failure during accelerated bench tests;
  • Analysis of Big Road Load Data (vehicle measurements);
  • Reliability predictions from a small sample size;
  • Fatigue simulation;
  • Data Mining for faster reliability predictions;
  • Data Driven Model-based Systems Engineering for automatic FMEA..
Download the PDF here download

Chris Wynn-Jones, Application Engineer – Reliability, HBK

Continuous Improvement of asset reliability is made possible with a combination of test data and field data. Using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), we can ask the right questions when attempting to study test and field data to calculate failure distributions over time. Failure modes can then be ranked, and plans proposed for supplementary testing where the data are found to be weak, or the reliability is lowest. Changes to the asset with respect to reliability improvement is actioned and traced through FMEA revision control. In this presentation we demonstrate how FMEA may be used to improve component reliability by combining qualitative engineering judgement with quantitative evidence derived through statistical rigour.

Download the PDF here download

Prof. Felician Campean, University of Bradford

While significant progress has been made with the development and adoption of computer modelling and simulation tools to assist with the systems design, many of the analysis methods, in particular those focussed on robustness and reliability for the design and process assurance, including the FMEA, remain expert-centred and time and resource intensive. This talk outlines the development of an MBSE-assisted automatic FMEA generation tool, that places the expert in-the-loop, tasked with providing inputs and systematically reviewing the outcomes as generated system models.

The approach emphasizes integration and traceability of requirements and critical characteristics across the levels of decomposition and analysis of the system. A case study of a robotic manufacturing process design for an electric drive unit is used to illustrate the use of the tool in an industrial context. This illustrates the cascade of the critical characteristics across multiple levels of process and tooling design analysis, supporting the synthesis of robust process controls plans for an Industry 4.0 implementation. As well as discussing the effectiveness of the tool, a reflection on the interaction between the analyst / expert, the MBSE model and FMEA, facilitated by the tool is provided. The practical benefits are the robustness and integrity of the FMEA and other design assurance documentation, and their governance for future use.

Download the PDF here download

Modern Slavery Statement     Imprint    Cookie Policy    Privacy Policy    Sitemap    Ethical Business

 

 

© 2024 Hottinger Brüel & Kjær

 

 

close
nCode logo
Graphics Brand

We have moved ${referer} to www.hbkworld.com

 

This will bring together HBM, Brüel & Kjær, nCode, ReliaSoft, and Discom brands, helping you innovate faster for a cleaner, healthier, and more productive world.

close
ReliaSoft-Logo-webp
Graphics Brand

We have moved ${referer} to www.hbkworld.com

 

This will bring together HBM, Brüel & Kjær, nCode, ReliaSoft, and Discom brands, helping you innovate faster for a cleaner, healthier, and more productive world.

close
Prenscia HBM-Logo rgb
Graphics Brand

We have moved ${referer} to www.hbkworld.com

 

This will bring together HBM, Brüel & Kjær, nCode, ReliaSoft, and Discom brands, helping you innovate faster for a cleaner, healthier, and more productive world.

close
HBM-Logo blue rgb
Graphics Brand

We have moved ${referer} to www.hbkworld.com

 

This will bring together HBM, Brüel & Kjær, nCode, ReliaSoft, and Discom brands, helping you innovate faster for a cleaner, healthier, and more productive world.

close
logo of Brüel & Kjær (BKSV), experts of sound and vibration measurements from HBK
Graphics Brand

We have moved ${referer} to www.hbkworld.com

 

This will bring together HBM, Brüel & Kjær, nCode, ReliaSoft, and Discom brands, helping you innovate faster for a cleaner, healthier, and more productive world.