arrow_back_ios

Main Menu

See All ソフトウェア See All 計測器 See All トランスデューサ See All 振動試験装置 See All 電気音響 See All 音響エンドオブライン試験システム See All アプリケーション See All インダストリーズ See All キャリブレーション See All エンジニアリングサービス See All サポート
arrow_back_ios

Main Menu

See All 解析シミュレーション See All DAQ See All APIドライバ See All ユーティリティ See All 振動コントロール See All 校正 See All DAQ See All ハンドヘルド See All 産業 See All パワーアナライザ See All シグナルコンディショナー See All 音響 See All 電流電圧 See All 変位 See All 力 See All ロードセル See All マルチコンポーネント See All 圧力 See All ひずみ See All ひずみゲージ See All 温度 See All チルト See All トルク See All 振動 See All アクセサリ See All コントローラ See All 測定加振器 See All モーダル加振器 See All パワーアンプ See All 加振器システム See All テストソリューション See All アクチュエータ See All 内燃機関 See All 耐久性 See All eDrive See All 生産テストセンサ See All トランスミッションギアボックス See All ターボチャージャ See All アコースティック See All アセット&プロセスモニタリング See All 電力 See All NVH See All OEMカスタムセンサ See All 構造的な整合性 See All 振動: See All 自動車・陸上輸送 See All 圧力校正|センサー|振動子 See All 校正・修理のご依頼 See All キャリブレーションとベリフィケーション See All キャリブレーション・プラス契約 See All サポート ブリュエル・ケアー
arrow_back_ios

Main Menu

See All nCode - 耐久性および疲労解析 See All ReliaSoft - 信頼性解析と管理 See All API See All 電気音響 See All 環境ノイズ See All 騒音源の特定 See All 製品ノイズ See All 音響パワーと音圧 See All 自動車通過騒音 See All 生産テストと品質保証 See All 機械分析・診断 See All 構造物ヘルスモニタリング See All バッテリーテスト See All 過渡現象時の電力測定入門 See All トランスの等価回路図|HBM See All アグリ業界向けOEMセンサー See All ロボティクスとトルクアプリケーション用OEMセンサー See All 構造ダイナミクス See All 材料特性試験 See All pages-not-migrated See All ソフトウェアライセンス管理

Reliability Analysis of a Storage Cluster System

This example is based on the example shown in Figure 8 of the article "Determining the Availability and Reliability of Storage Configurations" by Santosh Shetty, August 2002, as posted on Dell's website.

Example

 

Consider a "high-availability" cluster with a reliability block diagram (RBD), as shown next.

Figure 1: Storage Cluster System

Assume the following life distributions and parameters for the components: (Note that this example, unlike the original article, assumes no repair of failed components.)

 

  • Server: Exponential with mean = 45,753 hours
  • Switch: Exponential with mean = 255,358 hours
  • HBA: Exponential with mean = 252,550 hours
  • Controller: Exponential with mean = 68,961 hours

 

The objective of the analysis is to study the reliability of the system.

Analysis

 

Step 1: Create the RBD of the system in BlockSim, and then use the given information to configure the universal reliability definitions (URDs) of each block. For example, the following picture shows the Block Properties window of Server1. The inset shows the Model Wizard, which allows you to define the failure model of the block. The URDs of the other blocks can be configured in a similar manner.

Figure 2: Block Properties Window of Server1 and Model Wizard (inset)

Step 2: Once the URDs have been configured, analyze the diagram and obtain the system reliability equation of the system, as shown next. In this equation, each R is the reliability (1-cdf) function of the item. As an example, RServer2 is the reliability function of Server 2.

Figure 3: System Reliability Equation of the Storage Cluster System

Step 3: Generate system level plots to see more information about the system. The next two charts are component reliability importance plots at t = 8544 hr. Both plots (a tableau area plot and a bar chart) illustrate the same concept; that is, the higher the importance of the component, the higher its effect on system reliability.

Figure 4: Static Reliability Importance - Tableau Area Chart
Figure 5: Static Reliability Importance - Bar Chart

As you can see, the servers in this configuration are the most critical component, while the hubs are the least critical.

 

The following pictures show additional plots.

Figure 6: RI vs. Time Plot
Figure 7: System Reliability Plot
Figure 8: System Failure Rate Plot
Figure 9: System pdf plot

Step 4: Use BlockSim's Analytical Quick Calculation Pad (QCP) to obtain some of the most frequently requested reliability results. For example, the MTTF (mean time to failure) of the system is about 42,135 hours, as shown next.

Figure 10: Analytical QCP